Derailed commuting: A qualitative exploration of the travel burden on low-income women in Cape Town
Main Article Content
Abstract
South African cities are characterized by income segregation. Quantitative indicators of transport disadvantage show that in Cape Town, lower income households spend a disproportionate amount of time and money on travel relative to higher income households. Further, women, due to their roles as carers and household administrators, experience higher travel cost burdens relative to men. These quantitative indicators raise questions about the lived experience of transport disadvantage, and the sacrifices and trade-offs commuters are forced to make. In this study, a qualitative approach was employed to investigate the commute experiences of women who are low-income earners, as a means of supplementing existing quantitative data. The findings suggest that while trains present the most affordable mode of travel for respondents, the service is subject to disruptions, cancellations and sabotage which result in substantial, unexpected travel cost and travel time. This unexpected expenditure adversely impacts household money and time budgets, and respondents are forced to adjust these budgets to the detriment of their household consumption and activity participation. Furthermore, while commuting, the respondents all reported a fear of crime, witnessing criminal activity or being the victim of crime. It is concluded that the respondents’ transport disadvantage, together with their social disadvantage as women with low wages and low skills levels, interact to render them at risk of social exclusion. Given the observed impact of declining rail service on entrenching transport disadvantage, the most appropriate policy response to transport-related social exclusion in the city would be to improve the rail service as a matter of priority.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All authors submitting manuscripts to the African Cities Journal agree to the Creative Commons CC BY-SA license. Under this license, authors retain the copyright to their manuscripts while granting the Journal the right to publish and distribute the work under the terms of the CC BY-SA license. Other persons, including the authors, are free to share the manuscript on the medium of their choice. In the event of sharing a modified version of the manuscript, it is imperative to clearly indicate the parts where modifications have been made.
Any derivative or adaptation of the work must be distributed under the same license conditions (CC BY-SA), to ensure that subsequent works retain the same level of openness and accessibility. This ensures that the work remains freely accessible and retains the same licensing conditions, thus promoting the principles of knowledge sharing and collaboration within the scientific community while safeguarding the rights and interests of the original authors.
Regarding the reproduction and downloading of manuscripts in personal or institutional repositories, authors are generally authorized to archive preprints (version of the manuscript prior to peer review) or postprints (version reviewed and accepted for publication) in these repositories. In particular, authors can reproduce their postprints in their thesis (as a chapter). However, it is essential to respect the terms of the CC BY-SA license and duly cite the original version published in our journal.
For manuscripts that have been accepted for peer review but have not yet been published in the African Cities Journal at the time of thesis submission, authors should mention that the chapter is the preprint version of a manuscript under review in the Journal. Consequently, authors retain copyright on their thesis chapters while granting the journal the right to publish and distribute the work under the CC BY-SA license.